Who Makes Education?

Too often people think about things happening to them, rather than thinking about how they make things happen. Agency is important, and we must never forget that we have the capacity to act. You can see the results people can have in the current events in Tunisia and Egypt.

Agency is a critical part of citizenship – a point that Lewis Hyde makes in his excellent new book Common as Air. After discussing how the concept of property includes both rights of action and exclusion, and that the former is often forgotten, he says:

What might be called he active-verb part of property will be especially marked in those areas of social life where participation is essential. In a viable self-governing nation, for example, citizens can only know themselves by way of their civic agency. True citizens are not the audience of their government, nor its consumers; they are its makers. The same may be said of a viable culture.

It struck me as I read this that the same can be said of education. Try this out:

True students are not the audience of their education, nor its consumers, they are its makers.

In order to learn, you have to participate, you have to take action, and you have to connect ideas. We’ve known this at least going back to the foundation of the Socratic method.

What does education look like when you think of it in this way? I think it ends up looking a lot like the Connectivism and Connected Knowledge course put together by George Siemens and Stephen Downes. Here is part of how they describe it:

CCK11 is an unusual course. It does not consist of a body of content you are supposed to remember. Rather, the learning in the course results from the activities you undertake, and will be different for each person.

In addition, this course is not conducted in a single place or environment. It is distributed across the web. We will provide some facilities. But we expect your activities to take place all over the internet. We will ask you to visit other people’s web pages, and even to create some of your own.

It’s easy for educators to just tell people a bunch of stuff and expect them to remember it. It’s more challenging to create a situation that facilitates agency and learning – but that’s what innovative educators do.

In the same way, it’s easy to be a student when all you have to do is memorize and regurgitate. It’s a lot harder to create your own course.

But creating your own course, and your own assessment is what true students do. They exercise their right to action in their education.

Student and teacher of innovation - University of Queensland Business School - links to academic papers, twitter, and so on can be found here.

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

7 thoughts on “Who Makes Education?

  1. Thank you for sharing, Tim. I love this idea–having the ability to direct one’s learning while collaborating with others! Oftentimes, students are constrained by an inordinate amount of prerequisites until they can get to the meat of what they are interested in learning. This seems to facilitate learning that allows you to fill in the gaps as you go, a more holistic process, if I understand it correctly.

    Many brilliant students consider dropping out of university when they are limited by the process. I would be interested in your thoughts on this post-“Good Idea? VCs Thiel, Milner & Lee Investing $100K in Young Entrepreneurs.” http://bit.ly/fGfp1x

    Thank you! Angela Dunn @blogbrevity

  2. Timely!

    Learning occurs when knowledge is synthesized from information. I just wrote a post similar to this over the weekend. The way I see it, if I have to study to pass a test, the teacher failed his/hers.

    Teachers facilitate the synthesis of knowledge from available information. Coordinating the concerted, rote memorization of information and testing the immediate retention of said facts is hardly an education, yet seems to represent the bulk of the format these days.

    That CCK11 class looks both intriguing and challenging. Shame I only heard about it now. I’m going to investigate deeper. Thanks for sharing, Tim.

  3. Thanks Angela. In some respects the prerequisite issue is a bit different, because that is a program design issue. Here I was thinking more along the lines of within a particular class. However, it should be possible to get people more involved in that aspect of it too.

    Thanks also for the link to your post. That’s another very interesting issue. My university has several entrepreneurship contests targeting students (including one in the business school with a $100k top award) – but these are obviously designed to keep the students in school!

    Also – Deb’s comments on your post are spot-on I think.

Comments are closed.