Clicky

What doesn’t kill you makes you more innovative | The Discipline of Innovation

What doesn’t kill you makes you more innovative

Most of you would know the Nietzsche quote “that which doesn’t kill is makes us stronger” (or it could be a Kelly Clarkson quote, depending on your age). My main point for today is that quote also applies to innovation and this has far reaching implications for anyone trying to make a firm or industry more innovative.

Last year I was talking with Narelle Kennedy, CEO of the Australian Business Foundation, who has done a great job in connecting businesses, research academics and politicians to get a sensible and informed debate on innovation and growth in Australia. With colleagues at the University of Queensland Business School we have been running a large longitudinal survey of innovation and performance in Australian firms. One of the consistent patterns in the survey is that firms are far more likely to innovate when they are in a tough competitive environments. When I explained this to Narelle her response was something along the lines of “that makes sense, you need to experience pain to innovate”.

Narelle is exactly right! The list of evidence that innovation comes out of hard times and challenges is very long. For example, this is a central message in Michael Porter’s classic work “The Competititive Advatage of Nations”. To quote Porter:

A nation’s competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industry to innovate and upgrade. Companies gain advantage against the world’s best competitors because of pressure and challenge. They benefit from having strong domestic rivals, aggressive home-based suppliers, and demanding local customers.

And this is also the reason why protecting industries from competitive pain and providing public funds for pain relief rarely makes a business more competitive. With mainly good intentions, millions of dollars have been spent supporting the Australian car industry and yet it continues to die a slow and painful death. Like a billion dollar game of Russian Roulette, each government hopes that they can provide enough support so that the big collapse will occur during the life of the next government.

A good case in point for the ‘benefits of pain’ is a pretty amazing chart from Business Insider of the efficiency gains in the airline industry. I use the airline industry as an example of cut-throat competition in my MBA strategy class and Warren Buffett’s famous quote is particularly good:

If a farsighted capitalist had been present at Kitty Hawk, he would have done his successors a huge favor by shooting Orville down.

This is the kind of environment that produces the cummulative innovations that result in chart below (taken from Alan Kohler’s Eureka Report).


While traffic has increased 45%, fuel usage has increased 3%. To stay alive in this industry, firms need to continually find ways to improve pricing power and reduce costs and fuel efficiency is a big part of that.

If you want to be more innovative, embrace pain and challenge yourself.

5 Responses to What doesn’t kill you makes you more innovative

  1. Tim 3 February 2012 at 7:15 pm #

    Those stats are mind-boggling. I’m still astonished by that chart…

  2. Martin King 3 February 2012 at 10:39 pm #

    The need to jump from a burning platform is highly motivating

    However, unless you are a masochist and only enjoy pain or only get pleasure after the release of pain\stress the there is another point of view.

    Lets also consider the “power of pull” and the pleasure principle

    Pleasure, joy, curiosity, experimentation and exploration are also motivators of innovation in their own right.

    I guess its all very complex, relativistic and all depends on individual differences and context.

    I guess we could generalise and say we all need a bit of carrot and stick :)

  3. Martin King 3 February 2012 at 10:41 pm #

    Maybe we can relate the stick and carrot to Rogers Change ideas

    Early adopters are about the carrot
    Then we need the stick for late adopters to leap the Chasm

  4. John Steen 6 February 2012 at 9:50 am #

    Tim:

    I just checked if that chart passes the “make sense test”. There are probably several things going on behind the chart. Better scheduling and flight planning can probably account for over 10% of the gains and aircraft technology has advanced rapidly. For example, the Dreamliner uses 20% less fuel compared to other similar aircraft. That’s a big jump but there is steady impovement all the time.

  5. John Steen 6 February 2012 at 9:52 am #

    Hi Martin

    We can probably think about different motivations for innovation. Is avoiding pain and financial loss an incentive.. probably. Thanks for the note – it’s given me some more ideas for posts.

    John

Leave a Reply