Is technology about to disrupt your market? Chunka Mui and Paul B. Carroll think so, and they have some good suggestions about how to respond.
Archive | complex systems RSS feed for this section
TL;DR – when attention spans get shorter, we can either accommodate this by going short ourselves, or we can do the opposite and go deep.
It’s not enough to want to innovate more. We have to build the habits that will help us take the daily actions that will achieve this goal.
Tacit Knowledge and Why It’s Important There is a mining CEO in Australia who often says in private conversation something like: When it comes to new ideas, we’re anxious to be second They want to use a fast follower strategy. And there’s some sense to this approach. After all, trying to be first is risky. […]
Theodore Sturgeon said “90% of everything is crud.” This sounds cynical, but it actually leads to some important innovation lessons.
The business environment is changing, and competitive advantages have much shorter lifespans now. To combat this, you need to build an innovation capability for yourself, and for your organisation. Here are some ideas on how.
Risk and uncertainty are two different things. Mixing them up causes problems. Here are some ideas for dealing with uncertainty in particular.
Frederick Douglass said “Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing up the ground…” He was talking about political reform, but this is also true of innovation as well.
Do people love change or hate it? Are big firms better at innovation or are small ones? The answer to these questions is “both” – and we need to develop some skills for dealing with that.
How can you learn what you need to know to become an expert? It requires deep knowledge of a field, but it also requires broad knowledge of related fields. Our current technologies support deep, but not broad. We need to figure out a way to find t-shaped knowledge.
If I am fortunate enough to get promoted again, I’ll face a choice. My position can either be Associate Professor, or Reader. It will still be a while before I have to make that choice, but Reader is a pretty tempting title. Why would an academic be called a Reader? It comes from the days […]
The Manic Pixie Dream Girl Nancy and I saw Ruby Sparks last night, and really enjoyed it. It’s written by Zoe Kazan, who also stars, and it absolutely skewers the Manic Pixie Dream Girl trope. Nathan Rabin defined Manic Pixie Dreams Girls (MPDG) in his review of Elizabethtown: The Manic Pixie Dream Girl exists solely […]
- We’re Not Risk-Averse, We’re Variance-Averse 6 March 2014
- You Should Start a Blog Right Now 5 March 2014
- Ask Better Questions, Do More Stuff, and Think About Maps? 2 March 2014
- Writers Write, and Innovators Innovate 1 March 2014
- Why Experimenting Builds an Innovation Culture – Interview with DK 28 February 2014
- The Innovation Loop 24 February 2014
- This Week in Innovation – 23 February 2014 23 February 2014
- paul4innovating: Both show friction and tensions to really explore ...
- Research and Innovation in Online Learning | No fluff, just stuff...that matters.: […] Innovation […]...
- simfin: I assumed that people would think my writing was w...
- Tim Kastelle: Thanks for the comment - we were discussing this i...
- Tim Kastelle: I'm not sure that I've really figured it out mys...
- Tim Kastelle: Thanks Michael. The issue of slack is a huge one,...
- Tim Kastelle: Thanks for sharing that Paul. I see what you mean...