<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Innovation Leadership Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timkastelle.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog</link>
	<description>Designed in Brisbane by Tim Kastelle &#38; John Steen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Solving a Puzzle or a Mystery? by Culturematic by Grant McCracken Makes a Great Case for Experimenting &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/are-you-solving-a-puzzle-or-a-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-70889</link>
		<dc:creator>Culturematic by Grant McCracken Makes a Great Case for Experimenting &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4937#comment-70889</guid>
		<description>[...] is another tool that helps us when we are faced with a mystery rather than a puzzle. Mysteries are typified by large amounts of uncertainty, and in these situations, we must tools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is another tool that helps us when we are faced with a mystery rather than a puzzle. Mysteries are typified by large amounts of uncertainty, and in these situations, we must tools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Improve Your Innovation Competence &#8211; Experiment! by Culturematic by Grant McCracken Makes a Great Case for Experimenting &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/how-to-improve-your-innovation-competence-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-70887</link>
		<dc:creator>Culturematic by Grant McCracken Makes a Great Case for Experimenting &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4927#comment-70887</guid>
		<description>[...] are a critical innovation skill, and it&#8217;s one that you can use to build your Innovation Competence. A culture of experimentation is one of the elements that distinguishes highly innovative firms [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are a critical innovation skill, and it&#8217;s one that you can use to build your Innovation Competence. A culture of experimentation is one of the elements that distinguishes highly innovative firms [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70881</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting point Martin.  It&#039;s a bit strange, because the network concept is often used in opposition to hierarchy, and one of the things that is hard for me to get peoples&#039; heads around is that the networks do in fact differ from the formal relationships.  From a research standpoint, dynamic network measurement is on the cutting edge right now, and it is possible to pick up the fluidity of network relationships.  That&#039;s one of the great advantages of network analysis as an approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting point Martin.  It&#8217;s a bit strange, because the network concept is often used in opposition to hierarchy, and one of the things that is hard for me to get peoples&#8217; heads around is that the networks do in fact differ from the formal relationships.  From a research standpoint, dynamic network measurement is on the cutting edge right now, and it is possible to pick up the fluidity of network relationships.  That&#8217;s one of the great advantages of network analysis as an approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70880</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70880</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jordi - looking forward to reading your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jordi &#8211; looking forward to reading your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Martin King</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70861</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70861</guid>
		<description>Tim,

One comment into the mix - its a bit pedantic and doesn&#039;t particularly apply to this post but to concepts of network in general.

Structure I feel is too rigid a term for networks - for me it conotes more rigid, machinistic, industrial and manufactured connections - most often some form of hierarchy.   

I argue the case to use the term organisation - for me this conotes the more flexible, organic and social connections that networks can make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>One comment into the mix &#8211; its a bit pedantic and doesn&#8217;t particularly apply to this post but to concepts of network in general.</p>
<p>Structure I feel is too rigid a term for networks &#8211; for me it conotes more rigid, machinistic, industrial and manufactured connections &#8211; most often some form of hierarchy.   </p>
<p>I argue the case to use the term organisation &#8211; for me this conotes the more flexible, organic and social connections that networks can make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Why You Should Care About Network Structure &#124; Digital Delights &#124; Scoop.it</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70857</link>
		<dc:creator>Why You Should Care About Network Structure &#124; Digital Delights &#124; Scoop.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70857</guid>
		<description>[...] timkastelle.org  - Today, 3:17 AM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] timkastelle.org  &#8211; Today, 3:17 AM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Jordi Robert-Ribes</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordi Robert-Ribes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 07:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70851</guid>
		<description>Great analogy with carbon. I loved it.
In particular, the part that strong networks are diverse is exactly the point I&#039;m making on my post (published tomorrow). I&#039;ll include a reference to this post of yours.
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analogy with carbon. I loved it.<br />
In particular, the part that strong networks are diverse is exactly the point I&#8217;m making on my post (published tomorrow). I&#8217;ll include a reference to this post of yours.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Manchester Climate weekly nuggets 14 May 2012 &#124; manchester climate monthly</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70839</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester Climate weekly nuggets 14 May 2012 &#124; manchester climate monthly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70839</guid>
		<description>[...] Aspiring network-builders will want to read Tim Kastelle  on &#8220;Why you should care about network structure&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aspiring network-builders will want to read Tim Kastelle  on &#8220;Why you should care about network structure&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Solving a Puzzle or a Mystery? by Weekly bits of interest &#8211; 14 May 2012 &#124; Public Sector Innovation Toolkit</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/are-you-solving-a-puzzle-or-a-mystery/comment-page-1/#comment-70820</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly bits of interest &#8211; 14 May 2012 &#124; Public Sector Innovation Toolkit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4937#comment-70820</guid>
		<description>[...] types of problems require different types of solutions. Tim Kastelle looks at one characterisation of different categories of problems &#8211; puzzles and m.... &#8220;The problems that lead to disruptive innovations are often mysteries. This means that we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] types of problems require different types of solutions. Tim Kastelle looks at one characterisation of different categories of problems &#8211; puzzles and m&#8230;. &#8220;The problems that lead to disruptive innovations are often mysteries. This means that we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why You Should Care About Network Structure by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timkastelle.org/blog/2012/05/why-you-should-care-about-network-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-70787</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 19:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timkastelle.org/blog/?p=4949#comment-70787</guid>
		<description>Good point about the final line Martin!  I rewrote the end to make the point a bit more nuanced. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the final line Martin!  I rewrote the end to make the point a bit more nuanced. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

