Innovation is the Process of Idea Management
I am always suspicious of one-size-fits-all solutions. They are very easy to sell in a book or a blog post, but they rarely work in the real world. There’s too much variation. Â That’s a big part of why best practices are stupid.
Just think about the innovation process. Â I picture it like this:
How many different ways can we do those three steps? I didn’t give this list a huge amount of thought, so I’m sure that I’ve missed a few, but here are forty ways to innovate:
Idea Generation
- get to the edge
- scratch your own itch
- be a genius
- blue sky r&d
- applied r&d
- ask your customers
- watch your customers
- ask your people
- brainstorm
- gamestorm
- think outside the box
- think inside the box
- co-create
- scenario planning
Selection and Implementation
- experiment!!
- r&D
- stage/gate
- innovation team
- innovation coach
- expert panel
- minimum viable product
- iteration
- gut instinct
- does it fit with what we’ve always done?
- do whatever the CEO wants
- focus groups
- market testing
- A/B testing
- team consensus
Spreading Ideas
- network
- traditional distribution
- viral marketing
- advertising
- influentials
- small seeds
- word of mouth
- lead users
- co-creation
- pull strategies
- partnerships
What Combination Should We Choose?
These forty innovation methods can be combined in more than 2300 different ways. Â So why would should we think that only one way would work?
Within industries we often see one model used. Â In pharmaceuticals, ideas are generated through applied R&D, they are selected and developed through a stage/gate process, and new innovations are diffused through traditional channels. Â If everyone is doing it this way, you’d be crazy to stray too far from the pack, right? Â It would be nuts to come up with new ideas through a co-creation process with your customers, right?
Well, maybe not.
Joseph Schumpeter said:
(Economic) development in our sense is then defined by the carrying out of new combinations.
Carrying out new combinations. Â If there are at least 2300 ways to combine the different parts of the innovation process, why not innovate how you innovate? Â That’s what Procter & Gamble did when they developed their open innovation initiative Connect & Develop.
Schumpeter also said that innovation isn’t just about coming up with new stuff. Â He said it more elegantly than that, but that is the point that he was making. Â Our processes – the way we do things around here – are things that we often take completely for granted. Â If you figure out a way to innovate your process, it could lead to a completely new business model. Â And that’s one of the best forms of innovation around.
It’s time to start thinking about innovating how we innovate.







(combinations between elements) x ( the number of ways to combine) approaches infinite possibility. And I think that permutations count too!
Good post Tim!
Thanks Bart! I agree with you about permutations. And my estimate was the most conservative one possible – I think that your estimate of close to infinity is actually much closer to the truth!