Clicky

Networks and the Information Glut | The Discipline of Innovation

Networks and the Information Glut

Everyone knows that we’re living in a time of unprecedented access to information, right? Personally, I’m always a bit skeptical of these grand narratives. To see why, watch this short video showing the social networks of correspondence among 18th Century scientists:

It’s great research that illustrates some important points:

  • When we talk about ‘social networks’ we don’t just mean facebook and twitter. People have always functioned within networks, and these have always been important in the development and spread of ideas. James Fowler makes this same point in his interview with Stephen Colbert.
  • Ideas diffuse through networks. The structure of the networks through which we are trying to get our ideas to spread has a significant influence on the diffusion of our innovations. Our connections within the network can enhance or hinder our ability to get our ideas to spread. One of the reasons that Darwin gets credited with the idea of evolution through natural selection instead of Alfred Russell Wallace is that Darwin’s connections within the scientific community at the time were more numerous, more widespread, and better.
  • Even though we often feel like we’re overwhelmed with information and data to be absorbed, the information glut is nothing new. Think about the volume of connections shown in the video. Or think about Charles Darwin – over the course of scientific career he sent over 15,000 letters. It’s safe to assume that he received just as many. Think about how much time he would have spent reading & writing letters, and how much new information and ideas would have been included in that – it’s probably more than we’re spending writing our blogs, updating our statuses and twittering. In fact, if you just look at the networks, you might argue that Darwin was the Chris Brogan of the 19th Century.

The fundamentals of innovative thought haven’t changed since the 18th Century – it’s always been aggregate, filter and connect. The great thinkers of earlier times corresponded extensively because it helped them aggregate information from a wide variety of disciplines and sources. Once they did this, they had to be skilled at filtering the data to figure out what was useful, and then they had to connect up the filtered data to create innovative ideas.

And, of course, once they had the great ideas, they had to execute them, and then get them to spread. Even though the media that transmits the data to us are different now, aside from that, not much has changed.

(hat tip to Mitch Joel for the video link)

About Tim Kastelle

Student and teacher of innovation - University of Queensland Business School - links to academic papers, twitter, and so on can be found here.

22 Responses to Networks and the Information Glut

  1. Jon Husband 9 January 2010 at 4:29 pm #

    Good points, Tim. Something I always keep in the forefront of my memory: the last two chapters of a famous book from the 50′s chronicling the heyday of Taylorism-driven hierarchy (The Organization Man, by William F. Whyte) was all abut the structure and functioning of social networks, in company towns or in (regional) industries. True, virtually all of the networking was defined by what ‘level’ of the corporate / social hierarchy one inhabited.

    But still ..

  2. Tim 9 January 2010 at 4:41 pm #

    Thanks Jon! I still haven’t read Whyte yet though I’ve wanted to for a while. I wonder how that might link up with Sean Safford’s network study of Allentown & Youngstown over the second half of the 20th century? Sounds like there is some common ground there…

  3. Jon Husband 9 January 2010 at 4:49 pm #

    I wonder how that might link up with Sean Safford’s network study of Allentown & Youngstown over the second half of the 20th century? Sounds like there is some common ground there…

    Don’t know, but somehow I sense that neither of us would be surprised to not be surprised ;-)

  4. Alison 11 January 2010 at 4:28 am #

    Thanks for this, but isn’t onemain difference now that it isn’t just the intellectuals (middle class, already well connected males in the main) that are networking, but also the masses who have generally missed out on unearned talent and are making their own cultural capital.

  5. Tim 11 January 2010 at 6:08 am #

    That’s an excellent point Alison. I would agree that that is the probably the main difference, and it is a substantial one. Thanks for the feedback!

  6. Alison 11 January 2010 at 9:28 am #

    So if networking is changing – if the bricoleurs are constructing new knowledge and sharing it, what keeps folk in their place? Educational reproduction (Bourdieu), and the power of the text to classify and frame (Bernstein) are interesting metaphors to throw at this topic. Strong framing within a strong classification of knowledge is divisive, and seeks to maintain a hierarchical educational journey, the marginalised (or sometimes even the masses) have no access to the knowledge within a strongly framed structure except and via the teacher/patron. Change derives from the pressures for symbolic violence and control.
    Where does this take us? (Its late in the UK and still snowing!)

  7. Tim 11 January 2010 at 4:06 pm #

    Educational framing is certainly a plausible explanation, I think. I’m not so sure that ‘networking’ is changing. As you point out, the participants are different, but in many ways I think the process is similar…

  8. Sam 13 January 2010 at 10:53 am #

    that is the coolest application network visualisation I’ve ever seen!

  9. Tim 13 January 2010 at 12:07 pm #

    It’s pretty nice, isn’t it? Every time I watch the video I try to figure out what software they’re using. It’s from Stanford so maybe Linus can help us out…

  10. Sam 14 January 2010 at 8:41 am #

    Yeah I am sure he’d know. If that doesn’t work, could just email the dude in the video I guess. Would be a great way of visualising that data we have from the online network!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Correspondence « Clyde Street - 10 January 2010

    [...] John Steen and Mark Dodgson’s Innovation Leadership Network Blog and their post about Networks and the Information Glut. In a discussion of the Republic of Letters project at Stanford University they observe that: The [...]

  2. Information Overload? « Innovation « Innovation Leadership Network - 10 January 2010

    [...] Talks « Networks and the Information Glut [...]

  3. is it just me » Information Overload by Social Network? Not new! - 11 January 2010

    [...] forhis blog, I’d like to point out some posts explicitly that where very inspiring. The post Networks and the Information Glut discusses how “new” the phenomena of information overload really is: Or think about [...]

  4. Most Tweeted Articles by eLearning Experts: MrTweet - 11 January 2010

    Your article was most tweeted by eLearning experts in the Twitterverse…

    Come see other top popular articles surfaced by eLearning experts!…

  5. Pontydysgu – Bridge to Learning » Blog Archive » Social networks – not new but different - 11 January 2010

    [...] interesting post by Tim Kasteele on Networks and the Information Glut. Tim links to the video above by Dan Edelstein showing the social networks of correspondence among [...]

  6. Correspondence - 13 January 2010

    [...] John Steen and Mark Dodgson’s Innovation Leadership Network Blog and their post about Networks and the Information Glut. In a discussion of the Republic of Letters project at Stanford University they observe that: The [...]

  7. Darwin on Twitter « Aggregate « Innovation Leadership Network - 17 January 2010

    [...] on Twitter Last week I talked about 19th century communication networks, Charles Darwin, and how we have had more information coming at us than we’ve known what to [...]

  8. Aggregating, filtering and connecting is so old-fashioned « History Tech - 26 January 2010

    [...] I had buried much of that stuff deep in the brain until I ran across a recent post on the Innovation Leadership Network. In Networks and the Information Glut, Tim Kastelle and John [...]

  9. Personal Aggregate, Filter & Connect Strategies « Aggregate « Innovation Leadership Network - 26 January 2010

    [...] works at a personal level. This was really Sam’s question. I’ve talked about how Charles Darwin basically used an aggregate, filter and connect strategy, Phil Long talks about it as part of personal knowledge management, Howard Jarche has discussed it [...]

  10. Outsource Remembering to be More Innovative « Book Riffs « Innovation Leadership Network - 13 April 2010

    [...] larger point is one that I’ve made before: information overload has been around for a long time. Bush’s worries sound pretty familiar to us right now – there’s too much stuff to [...]

  11. Aggregate, Filter, Connect……in Person « Go Foxburg! - 16 March 2011

    [...] glenw and Tim Kastille and John Steen tell us (here and here, respectively), successful business people have been doing this for centuries. They’ve called [...]

  12. Networks and the Information Glut | digitalNow ... - 1 January 2014

    […] Everyone knows that we're living in a time of unprecedented access to information, right? Personally, I'm always a bit skeptical of these grand narratives. To see why, watch this short video showin…  […]

Leave a Reply