Clicky

Innovation Obstacle: Bureaucracy? | The Discipline of Innovation

Innovation Obstacle: Bureaucracy?

What is the innovation that led to civilization?

There are some interesting answers to this question in Why the West Rules, For Now by Ian Morris. As part of his research, Morris has developed a Social Development Index, which he uses to track the progress of civilizations from 14000 BC to present. The index tracks improvements in areas such as energy capture (both as food and as fuel), organizational capability, technology development, and information sharing capacity.

Here is what the graph shows (taken from this .pdf that summarizes the research):

The first big jump happened between 2000 and 1000 BC, indicated by the very crude arrow that I’ve added. What was the innovation that caused that jump?

The invention of Bureaucracy.

Morris (and many other historians) argue that it was the invention of bureaucracy that actually triggered the development of agriculture, written communication, and other tools that are necessary for people to undertake complex tasks.

Bureaucracy is one of the most important innovations in human history – without it, we’d still be in caves. So why does it get such a bad rap whenever we talk about innovation? It’s nearly impossible to discuss innovation within organisations without hearing complaints about bureaucracy and bureaucrats.

The problem isn’t actually with bureaucracy. Bureaucracy makes systems, supports the development of routines, and gives us some constraints – which are actually essential to innovation (see here and here for examples). We need all of these things to innovate.

The problem with bureaucracy is when we follow rules simply for the sake of following rules. This is another form of path dependence, which leads to lock-in on sub-optimal systems. The problem is with bureaucratic systems that don’t support strategy – these stifle innovation.

Bureaucracy is actually a neutral term, like aerodynamics. To call a car “aerodynamically designed” is a nonsense – all cars have aerodynamics. It’s just that Teslas and Porsches have excellent aerodynamics, while minivans and SUVs have terrible aerodynamics.

In the same way we can have excellent bureaucracy, which supports innovation, and terrible bureaucracy, which obstructs innovation.

Bureaucracy isn’t actually an innovation obstacle, but bad bureaucracy is.

About Tim Kastelle

Student and teacher of innovation - University of Queensland Business School - links to academic papers, twitter, and so on can be found here.

7 Responses to Innovation Obstacle: Bureaucracy?

  1. Mathieu Halley 24 September 2011 at 9:17 pm #

    Wow. If nothing else, that graph does a spectacular job of illustrating the effect of the Industrial Revolution.

  2. Tim 28 September 2011 at 8:39 am #

    It does Mathieu. The Morris book is really good for anyone interested in the history of economic development.

  3. Corinna 1 October 2011 at 7:07 am #

    Very interesting thought!
    You found words for my gut feeling that rules and processes are not inherently bad, but can actually be helpful.

    Thanks for that!

  4. Tim 2 October 2011 at 8:28 pm #

    I’m glad the post was useful Corinna!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Innovation Obstacle: Bureaucracy? | The Jazz of Innovation | Scoop.it - 22 September 2011

    [...] Innovation Obstacle: Bureaucracy? What is the innovation that led to civilization? There are some interesting answers to this question in Why the West Rules, For Now by Ian Morris. Source: timkastelle.org [...]

  2. The Fundamental Problem in Management | LDRLB - 20 March 2013

    [...] of the bad aspects of bureaucracy come from trying to build systems that provide certainty in a world that is by its very nature [...]

  3. Carnival of Quality Management and Articles Blog Festival – April 2013 | The world is too small? or Is it? - 21 April 2013

    [...] uncertainty…The problem with requiring certainty is that when you do, you fail to act.. All of the bad aspects of bureaucracy come from trying to build systems that provide certainty in a world that is by its very nature [...]

Leave a Reply